<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CGE Wins $34 Arbitration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cge6069.org/cge_wins_34_arbitration/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cge6069.org/cge_wins_34_arbitration</link>
	<description>AFT Local 6069</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 02:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://cge6069.org/cge_wins_34_arbitration/comment-page-1#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cge6069.org/?p=578#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that it is a matter of avoiding paying the extra tuition.  Botany actually &quot;reimburses&quot; us for the tuition and some health insurance.  The problem with that is they pay us back over a three month period which has two downsides for us.  1) we get taxed on the &quot;extra&quot; income and 2) unless we can afford to pay off the charges to our student account right away, we get charged interest starting in June, but don&#039;t start getting reimbursed until July.  I also agree that it is not completely the department&#039;s fault.  Because the university has to count us as being here using credit hours it forces this kind of situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that it is a matter of avoiding paying the extra tuition.  Botany actually &#8220;reimburses&#8221; us for the tuition and some health insurance.  The problem with that is they pay us back over a three month period which has two downsides for us.  1) we get taxed on the &#8220;extra&#8221; income and 2) unless we can afford to pay off the charges to our student account right away, we get charged interest starting in June, but don&#8217;t start getting reimbursed until July.  I also agree that it is not completely the department&#8217;s fault.  Because the university has to count us as being here using credit hours it forces this kind of situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: organizer</title>
		<link>http://cge6069.org/cge_wins_34_arbitration/comment-page-1#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>organizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cge6069.org/?p=578#comment-4645</guid>
		<description>Noah,

The decision many departments make to move grads to hourly summer positions is, I think, made mostly because departments avoid paying for nine credits of tuition waiver that way, which is a totally reasonable desire.  The current problems that I see are (a) lack of subsidized health insurance and (b) lack of contract protections.  (The fee differential doesn&#039;t currently apply to summer anyway.)  The OSU bargaining team always makes a big deal about summer being different than the rest of the year, and so far we haven&#039;t prioritized working on summer stuff.  That could very well change in the future - I imagine if the nine-credit requirement were changed, departments would be much more amenable to keeping grads on assistantships, unless there is some other piece I&#039;m missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noah,</p>
<p>The decision many departments make to move grads to hourly summer positions is, I think, made mostly because departments avoid paying for nine credits of tuition waiver that way, which is a totally reasonable desire.  The current problems that I see are (a) lack of subsidized health insurance and (b) lack of contract protections.  (The fee differential doesn&#8217;t currently apply to summer anyway.)  The OSU bargaining team always makes a big deal about summer being different than the rest of the year, and so far we haven&#8217;t prioritized working on summer stuff.  That could very well change in the future &#8211; I imagine if the nine-credit requirement were changed, departments would be much more amenable to keeping grads on assistantships, unless there is some other piece I&#8217;m missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://cge6069.org/cge_wins_34_arbitration/comment-page-1#comment-4643</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cge6069.org/?p=578#comment-4643</guid>
		<description>Nice work!  Too bad Botany makes us &quot;student hourly&quot; employees in the summer, I am pretty sure that means we will not get reimbursed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work!  Too bad Botany makes us &#8220;student hourly&#8221; employees in the summer, I am pretty sure that means we will not get reimbursed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

